ISDS Case Map
News from the movements
The report shows how EU trade agreements with these three countries undermine the conditions needed for agroecological food systems to thrive. Developed together with researchers and partner organisations in all three countries, the report builds on decades of work linking local realities to the global rules that shape them.
New research from the Trade Justice Movement challenges the idea that trade policy is too technical for public debate.
Overview of the transnational investment protection regime that undermines water, territories and self-determination.
Heading into the AANZFTA review in late 2026, dozens of regional civil society organizations are urging ASEAN nations, Australia, and New Zealand to remove or bilaterally bypass Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) provisions. They argue these corporate-friendly clauses allow foreign investors to sue governments for billions over public interest laws, serving as a major systemic obstacle to urgent environmental and climate action.
Failure to address the causes of the crisis in contemporary capitalism will force communities back on their own resources. It is not a battle we can wait another of decades to address, while our governments continue to ride the free trade bicycles over the cliff.
On 24-29 April 2026, 57 countries came together for the first conference on transitioning away from fossil fuels in Santa Marta, Colombia, co-organised by Colombia and the Netherlands.
Let us strengthen European food sovereignty!
Public Citizen, along with the labor, environmental, consumer, faith, and family farm groups that make up the Citizens Trade Campaign (CTC) national coalition, submitted recommendations for the record in response to the U.S. Trade Representative’s (USTR) request for public comment on the modernization of the AGOA).
The ideological convergence between digital free-trade policy, Silicon Valley platform ideology and crypto-libertarianism is difficult to ignore. All promote distrust toward public regulation, celebrate borderless markets, and frame technological systems as superior alternatives to democratic governance.
The EPA would have a negative and potentially devastating impact on populations' right to food, as well as on peasant producers' right to use, select, protect and exchange seeds of their choice.
