investor-state disputes | ISDS


US arbitration court can rule on Vattenfall's German nuclear claim
A US arbitration court has rejected a German government petition that said the panel had no right to rule on a damages claim by Sweden’s Vattenfall. Berlin cited a ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
RCEP talks: India manages major breakthrough
New Delhi won't not take additional commitment on intellectual property rights beyond the TRIPS agreement it has already accepted at the WTO; investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism only for limited sectors.
International Energy Charter draft model investment dispute prevention and management protocol
The proposed instrument is of little benefit to states on either account and it is overly intrusive into government administrative processes.
Energy Charter Treaty: Draft model investment dispute prevention and management protocol
Drafted by the Energy Charter Secretariat
Revised FTA to curb overuse of legal dispute by foreign investors
Lawyers claim investor-state dispute settlement should be abolished in FTA as in NAFTA.
S. Korea discloses revised clauses of FTA with US
South Korea will collect public opinions on the recently revised free trade agreement with the United States before sending it to the parliament for approval.
Energy arbitration in Latin America
Latin American countries have been respondents in approximately 30 per cent of all International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) cases.
Malampaya’s P53-B tax case vs gov’t kicks off
Following the arbitral proceedings at the ICC, the government still faces another dispute relative to the Malampaya case at the ICSID, pursuant to the Philippines-Netherlands Bilateral Investment Treaty. Hearings are scheduled October 23-24 this year.
ICSID condemns Egypt to pay €1,735 million to Naturgy and ENI for a gas plant
The Spanish group will seek an agreement with the country to recover normality at the Damietta plant.
Micula: ICSID enforcement before the English Court of Appeal
The Court of Appeal maintained the stay of enforcement of Viorel Micula and others v Romania award, but overturned his decision on security, ordering that Romania should provide £150 million as a term of the stay.