corporate positions (texts of)
Statements, letters and position papers from business associations, corporate lobby groups and individual firms
20-Jun-2006
Letter from the US Biotechnology Industry Organisation to the US Trade Representative on intellectual property, GM labelling, biosafety, GM contamination and other issues BIO wants addressed under the US-Malaysia FTA talks.
14-Jun-2006
'Right now, the President and Congress are discussing a free trade agreement with Korea. This potential trade agreement is an opportunity to demand some reciprocity, including full and unimpeded access for US made vehicles to the Korean market. Anything less will not be worthy of our support.'
26-Mar-2006
USTR
Report of the US government's Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Intellectual Property Rights (ITAC-15)
6-Jan-2006
PhRMA
PhRMA believes that a strong FTA is in the interests of Egyptian patients
as well as the business community.
26-Nov-2005
Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE)/Nippon Keidanren Joint Statement
3-Feb-2005
NAM
After extensive discussion within the
NAM's International Economic Policy Committee, a consensus was reached to
recommend Egypt, India, Malaysia, New Zealand, and South Korea for US FTAs; and to place the five others - Brazil, China, The European Union, Japan, and Taiwan on a Watchlist,
possibly to be recommended in the future as circumstances change.
26-Jan-2005
National Foreign Trade Council
As an important lynchpin between Europe, Africa and the Middle East, access to the Moroccan market
is essential for the U.S. banking, insurance and telecommunications industries.
12-Nov-2004
ABAC
An Issues Paper for the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC)
22-Sep-2004
Entertainment Industry Coalition for Free Trade
The Entertainment Industry Coalition for Free Trade (EIC), a group of leading entertainment companies, trade associations and entertainment unions and guilds, today applauded the conclusion of the U.S. - Australia Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
16-Sep-2004
In the course of consultations with services industries on the Model BIT, a number of serious concerns have been raised. These relate to (1) the prospective nature of the Model BIT; (2) the breadth of the BIT's prudential carve-out; (3) the limitations on recourse to investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms in certain cases; and, (4) the dispute settlement process itself.