ISDS Case Map
climate
The trade deal could facilitate energy companies suing Member State governments when environmental policies threaten their profits.
With global inequalities spiralling and the climate crisis on our doorstep, the last thing we need is a trade deal that would worsen both.
On behalf of monopoly firms and local elites, imperialist states have been competing to rewrite international and national legal systems and regulations through trade and investment agreements
Opinion on international trade and investment agreements : « Let us not sacrifice human rights for commercial interests - The example of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between the European Union and Canada (CETA) »
We urgently need a new approach to trade that prioritizes the needs of people and planet.
Rising inequality is largely to blame for this electoral upset. Continuing with business as usual is not an option.
Our trade agreements—current and proposed—don't send the right signals for the U.S. and other countries to meet their Paris commitments.
The election of Trump could well have significant long-term implications for global food security and efforts to tackle climate change.
The relationship between trade policy and climate policy needs to improve in the future, in particular with a view towards implementing the Paris Agreement.
Climate change is a serious threat to humankind and arbitration could play a key role in this era.
