West Asia

(DP World)

In West Asia, trade and investment agreements have either been pushed by regional blocs or individual powers, such as Israel, Türkiye or the UAE. They primarily serve the interests of the region’s corporations and elites to the detriment of communities and the environment. Although resistance from social movements does exist, it has been less visible than in other regions due to the authoritarian nature of most of the region’s governments.

One of the oldest initiatives is the Greater Arab Free Trade Area or the Pan-Arab Free Trade Area (GAFTA) launched by the Arab League in 1978 and coming into force in 1998. Since 2005 the elimination of almost 100% tariffs on most agricultural and industrial goods among the GAFTA members was enforced. The 18 states that are members are: Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen. Comoros, Djibouti, Mauritania and Somalia are candidates for membership.

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) includes Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, with Yemen participating only in limited GCC affiliated bodies. The GCC has dealt head-on with bilateral free trade agreements (FTA) at various levels. Some of its members, such as Bahrain and Saudi Arabia have signed bilateral treaties with foreign powers like the United States. As a group, the GCC has established FTAs in 2008 with Singapore and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and with Pakistan in 2023. The GCC is currently negotiating other FTAs with ASEAN, China, Japan, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, New Zealand, and the UK.

The GCC signed an Economic Cooperation Agreement with the European Union in 1988 and started negotiations on a bilateral free trade agreement in 1990. But those were dropped in 2008 due to the EU’s insistence on political demands, pushed by civil society groups, such as the International Federation for Human Rights. In the UK, civil society groups have criticised the GCC-UK deal under negotiation for ignoring human rights and climate issues.

As part of its strategy to diversify its economy parallel to fossil fuels and consolidate its geopolitical position, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has pushed aggressively to forge bilateral trade deals, dubbed Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements (CEPAs), and investment treaties. It has signed 32 CEPAs with countries spread across different regions and active negotiations are underway. Already an established business and tourism hub, the UAE seeks to consolidate its status as a financial powerhouse and expand into sectors such as clean energy, technology and agribusiness. Food security is a critical geostrategic concern for the UAE, given its reliance on food imports. Through a tightly controlled network of ports and logistics platforms, and new CEPAs, the UAE aims to become a central hub in the global agri-food trading system, where corporations can import and re-export products across Asia, Africa and Europe quickly and duty-free.

In 2025, civil society mobilisation pressured members of the European Parliament to call for an end to negotiations on the EU-UAE trade deal, amid concerns about potential arms sales to the UAE-backed paramilitary force, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which has been accused of committing war crimes in Sudan.

Another GCC state pushing for trade deals is Saudi Arabia. In 2025 alone, it signed a trade agreement with South Sudan and investment treaties with Egypt, Syria and Uruguay. It also started negotiations for bilateral investment treaties with India and Hong Kong, as well as an FTA with Thailand. Meanwhile, Oman signed an FTA with the US in 2006 and another with India in 2025.

Iran only signed a free trade agreement with the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in 2025, and maintains preferential trade agreements with Türkiye and Pakistan.

Israel has signed FTAs with countries or regional blocks such as: Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, EFTA, the EU, Jordan, Mercosur, Mexico, Panama, South Korea, Türkiye, Ukraine, the UAE, UK, US and Vietnam. Negotiations are ongoing with Bahrain, China, India, Moldova, Serbia. It is also exploring possibilities with Australia, Japan and Thailand. Israel uses trade agreements to expand the sphere of influence of its transnational corporations, most of which have grown out of the illegal occupation of Palestine.

The Justice for Palestine European Citizens' Initiative called for the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement in response to Israel’s numerous human rights abuses during the war in Gaza, as well as its breaches of multiple rules and obligations under international law. The campaign received one million signatures. Similar calls have been made by the European Trade Justice Coalition, European trade unions, and hundreds of civil society groups. Over the past couple of decades, social movements in other countries that have signed free trade deals with Israel have mobilised in solidarity with Palestine. Examples include actions in Canada, Costa Rica, India, Mercosur. A major victory for the movements was achieved in Colombia in 2025, when the country cancelled its FTA with Israel.

Türkiye has also developed a vast network of free trade agreements. It has FTAs in force with: Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Chile, EFTA, Egypt, Faroe Islands, Georgia, Kosovo, Malaysia, Mauritius, Montenegro, Moldova, Morocco, North Macedonia, Palestine, Qatar, Serbia, Singapore, South Korea, Tunisia, the UAE, the UK, and Venezuela. FTAs with Lebanon, Sudan and Ukraine are under ratification, while negotiations are ongoing with the GCC, Indonesia and Japan.British and Turkish unions demanded in 2021 the suspension of the UK – Türkiye trade deal due to labour rights violations in Türkiye.

Last update: May 2026

Photo: DP World


Misleading and false INTA report as basis for Parliamentary vote
The report of the Parliament's International Trade Committee (INTA) that serves as a basis for the vote on the extension of the EU-Morocco trade deal into occupied Western Sahara contains highly misleading and false claims.
Time for EU to stop being bystander in Western Sahara
The EU has sadly afforded preferential treatment to Morocco's illegal occupation of Western Sahara including by knowingly excluding from the trade talks the thousands of Saharawis forced to live in exile in refugee camps as a result of the occupation.
EU Court confirms: Western Sahara not part of EU-Morocco fish deal
For a third consecutive time in less than three years, the Court of Justice of the European Union has confirmed that the EU's policy of incorporating Western Sahara into its bilateral agreements with Morocco is unlawful.
EU fisheries deal with Morocco sparks criticism over inclusion of Western Sahara waters
A fresh legal row may be brewing over the EU’s trade links with Morocco, after the two sides finalised a controversial new fisheries agreement, following almost three months of negotiations.
Morocco, EU finalize new fisheries agreement
Morocco and the European Union have finalized a new fisheries agreement.
Caught fishing illegally in occupied Western Sahara
Several EU-flagged vessels have blatantly ignored and violated the EU Court judgment invalidating the EU-Morocco fish agreement in Western Sahara.
Polisario condemns Council's approval of Western Sahara trade deal
The Western Sahara liberation movement, Frente Polisario, has issued a statement condemning today's EU Council decision to include Western Sahara in the Morocco trade agreement.
The Commission’s proposals to correct EU-Morocco relations and the EU’s obligation not to recognise as lawful the ‘illegal situation’ in Western Sahara
The proposals violate the EU and its Member States’ obligation of non-recognition of Morocco’s breaches: the right to self-determination of people, the prohibition on aggression, and some of the ‘intransgressible rules’ of international humanitarian law.
EU-Morocco deal: EU is misguiding the Member States, warns WSRW
The Commission tries to misguide the Member States concerning the consultation process launched to "comply" with the European Court of Justice, which had rejected the inclusion of Western Sahara in the EU-Morocco Association Agreement.
EU Parliament critical of Commission’s Western Sahara approach
The EU Commission received heavy critique from the European Parliament for its suggestion to include occupied Western Sahara in a trade deal with Morocco.